Are Some Ways of Knowing More Likely Than Others to Lead to Truth? Essay

Most populate cogitate that money soak ups the world go round. merely scholars weigh new(prenominal)wise. It is the friendship of how to acquire riches and of how to make the most of it is re tout ensembley the crucial factor. Humans couldnt project k straight off this world with all its richness in resources and mysteries without ample knowledge of how to do so. It is the gift of knowledge that has specialize benignants apart(predicate) from both other living species. So it is scarcely proper that scholars delve into studying the excogitation of knowledge for us to recognise it better. To be more specific, this school of concept is called the theory of Knowledge. possibility of knowledge is to a fault kn decl atomic number 18 as Epistemology. What is so special(a) well-nigh possibleness OF Knowledge is that it is widely considered as the most important sub-field of philosophy. The Theory of knowledge had made signifi supportt promotions since it was runner formally study. plainly even though it has already presented m any(prenominal) a(prenominal) different slipway to find oneself the lawfulness, many noneffervescent ask Are some ship canal of designed more resemblingly to be successful to lead to the righteousness than other methods (ship canal of Knowing). Scholars take a shit dedicated their studies for the further advancement of the Theory of Knowledge. They have gone done and finished unfathomable debates and research for the advancement of the field. This is beca hurtle on of the demand for better understanding is ever-increasing as military personnel progresses.The law is what e reallyone wants. What makes things elusive for scholars studying the Theory of Knowledge is that many philosophers overly bespeak that the law movenot be contained, it sternnot be resolved, it is unattain adequate to(p). However, the Theory of Knowledge counters the argument by presenting to us five ways of knowing that could instigate us in obtaining the trueness. The five ways of knowing be logic, revelation, oral communication, sense, and emotion. Let us break-dance further details almost the five ways of knowing and impose if one enkindle be the outdo way of getting to the truth ( scarcelychvarov 1970). find For psychologists, sense or perception pertains to the processes that necessitate the acquisition, organization, interpretation, and selection of randomness acquired through the embodied senses. These conventional senses that we are familiar with are namely sight, relishing, touch, smell, and hearing. Sensory information is fundamentally acquired through sensory organs that send away be found in the human anatomy.We can be easily acquaint with this particular way of knowing beca drug ab employ we spue it into delectation on a periodic basis. We ingestion our eyes to view colors, we can tell the difference in hear between an frost cream and fish, we example our hands to feel rough and down surfaces, we uptake our ears to listen to music. These are pragmatic things we do everyday that we put into call to know, to obtain truth (Gibson 1966). beyond the five senses that we are familiar with, in that respect are also addition to the uncorrupted senses like temperature, balance, pain, and other recently studied sense that would be too adept to discuss in this paper. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, a French phenomological philosopher, argues that sense is the foundation of all knowledge and attainments. Even though sense itself cannot make up meaning to the objects it senses in this world, the person is able to give meaning from his or her own consciousness. The do of the senses requires constant commit for it to give meaning to the objects in this world. As we put into practice our senses, we develop what is called mental models. As the tidings suggests, as sensory information is sent to our brain, we develop models that we can use as reference if ever t he senses insure the object again. It is like making imprints in our brain about the things around us. With the use of sense as an betterment to obtaining truth, humanness can obtain the truth, or at least have an idea, by victimization the brains capabilities. In simpler terms, with the use of senses, humans make the full use of what they intrinsically have, our very own bodies. The scarcely drawback I can offer about apply senses to obtain truth is that we cant always gain approach to the objects involved in our queries. For example, if we hear a radio advertisement about ice cream stating that it is sweet, we cant authorize the claim since we are only development hearing, we wear upont actually taste the real thing.Logic If we go into the etymology of the volume logic, we could unearth meanings like reasoning, argument, idea, principle, and thought. It is in the first place concerned with the severeness of inferences. It is considered a ramification of philosophy. Im manuel Kant argued that logic should be a science devoted to studying judgments (Russel 1917). Logic, like senses, also makes use of the capabilities of the human brain. If we use this as an approach to obtain truth, logic assesses all possible arguments, eliminates all improbable answers to acclaim up with the most convincing. Logic can be a very competent way to obtain truth. Actually, it is as utilize as senses, also in a daily basis. save oftentimes we get it on across things that our minds cant comprehend. This is because logic, like sense, makes use of what we already know.So if we use logic in questions about the instauration of ghosts, we hastily jump to conclusion that they dont exist because it defies logic. The bother hither is that there are people who believe in the human beings of ghosts. So the existence of two different truths makes either feeble. wrangle Language is basically our means of communication. It oddly refers to the use of various forms of communi cation and the set conventional rules that governs its usage (Crystal 2001). Personally I wouldnt use language to educe truth. Humans have developed the use of language far more than any specie could have. Humans have accommodate so adept in employ language that we can easily verify it. If language is used in conclave with logic and reasoning, humans can make truths come out of nowhere. Moreover, there is the concept of lying that can lead us farther from the truth. For example, if there is a streamlet in court. The lawyers from the two opposing parties have different interest. They defend their arguments with adept use language. The problem may arise if the artless caller, shall I say was outspoken by the opposing party. Then the judge was affect by the adept use of language even though the opposing party was just presenting lies all the time, just disquisition them in a very silvery manner. Thus the verdict testament just be decided by how address were used. The verdi ct will be considered the truth however it is far from the real thing. perception There are so many definitions for the word emotion. Actually, there is no universally agreed term for the word emotion. tally to the APA Dictionary of Psychology, it is a complex reception pattern that a person uses to approach a significant and personal matter. possibly feelings would make the subject of emotions lots simpler. Feelings are the experiences that come with emotions. Feelings are very effective tools for obtaining truth. Humans have this unexplainable expertness to know things just be using their feelings. There are such evasive concepts such as gut-feel and motherly instincts (Cornelius 1996). But the problem with using feelings to obtain truth is that emotions and feelings are very prone to be aslant. Also since emotions are complex in nature, it will also provide us complex results. I believe that the truth should be unbiased before it is presented or accepted. For example, I wi ll use the judicature scenario again, the truth is that the defendant really did the misdemeanour he is accused of. He and so delivered a very empathic oral communication that convinced the jury. The decision of the jury had a expectant impact on the terminal verdict. Once again, it failed to obtain truth as the jury felt that the defendant was innocent. later all, a feeling is only a feeling and certainly not of necessity the truth.Revelation And last but in spades not the least, we have revelation as a way of knowing. Revelation, as the word suggests, is about a disclosure that has been provided by a divine being. What has been divulge is something initially unknown and implausible for humans to uncover. We can also call this divine intervention. The realizations and messages disclosed during revelations transcend the known boundaries of human comprehension.We are familiar with revelations as it happened to the most known prophets that later on became the proponents of t he worlds most popular religions. Most of the example that the revelations happen to the prophets is when they are in a meditating or in a reverie state. Some accounts of revelations happen in dreams. But revelations are not exclusive to great prophets. Actually there are much many accounts of revelation to normal people (Franz 1975). Probably the trump example of the use of revelations is on the sanctified books of the worlds most popular religions. These holy books are distributed around the globe in countless copies. The religions devout followers live their lives harmonise to the delivery of these scriptures. It is because these people believe these words to be the truth.That these words are the very words of God himself. Many may challenge the level of truthfulness of these holy scriptures. But if they take in affection what weve learned in theory of knowledge, we will discover we shouldnt challenge the validity of these scriptures. We are talking about religion here, f aith is something that cant be easily shattered within a person. When we say that a certain smell is someones faith, that automatically counts as that someones truth.Conclusion thought and logic could have been the best ways to knowing the truth. However they both barbarous short as both of them have certain limitations. Both of these ways of knowing is relying much to the capabilities of the brain, which we know as of now is very limited. Language and emotions are too complex to put into use of obtaining the truth. And the problem was both of them often leads to a biased truth, which we cant categorize as a genuine truth. As the best ay of knowing the truth, I preferred it through revelation. The other ways of knowing the truth made me realize how hard it is to obtain truth. Also, the word faith comes with the rod revelation. I believe we should be faithful to what is true. Im aware that it is still difficult to prove revelations through physical evidence. But we dont need any o f that evidence if we get our goal, the truth. Maybe the truth is really far from the reaches of our comprehension. Maybe if we research more the possibilities of revelations may it be through religious meditations or simple dreaming.whole kit and boodle CitedButchvarov. The Concept of Knowledge. Evanston, Northwestern University Press. 1970Cornelius, R. The science of emotion. naked Jersey Prentice Hall. 1996Crystal, David. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the face Language. Cambridge, CambridgeUniversity Press. 2001Gibson, James J. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston. 1966Raymond Franz. The suppress Time for God to Act. Crisis of Conscience,.1975. pp. 237253Russell, Bertrand. Mysticism and Logic. London. Allen and Unwin. 1917Ways of Knowing. Problems of Knowing and Linking Questions. 7 January 2008